So, according to Marvin, if a valedictorian was a Westboro Baptist Church member, it would have been appropriate for him to say "God Hates Fags" in his speech.
zed
really proud of this young man for his speech.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nir4zbz18e.
.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/trending-now/valedictorian-rips-preapproved-speech-recites-prayer-instead-172941933.html.
So, according to Marvin, if a valedictorian was a Westboro Baptist Church member, it would have been appropriate for him to say "God Hates Fags" in his speech.
zed
really proud of this young man for his speech.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nir4zbz18e.
.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/trending-now/valedictorian-rips-preapproved-speech-recites-prayer-instead-172941933.html.
Marvin is as Marvin does.
Contextomy refers to the selective excerpting of words from their original linguistic context in a way that distorts the source’s intended meaning, a practice commonly referred to as "quoting out of context". The problem here is not the removal of a quote from its original context (as all quotes are) per se, but to the quoter's decision to exclude from the excerpt certain nearby phrases or sentences (which become "context" by virtue of the exclusion) that serve to clarify the intentions behind the selected words. Comparing this practice to surgical excision, journalist Milton Mayer coined the term "contextomy" to describe its use by Julius Streicher, editor of the infamous Nazi broadsheet Der Stürmer in Weimar-era Germany. To arouse anti-semitic sentiments among the weekly’s working class Christian readership, Streicher regularly published truncated quotations from Talmudic texts that, in their shortened form, appear to advocate greed, slavery, and ritualistic murder. [3] Although rarely employed to this malicious extreme, contextomy is a common method of misrepresentation in contemporary mass media, and studies have demonstrated that the effects of this misrepresentation can linger even after the audience is exposed to the original, in context, quote.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_quoting_out_of_context
zed
jw leaks has published the respondent's brief prepared by rick simons in the case: candace conti v. watchtower bible and tract society of new york & fremont congregation of jehovah's witnesses.
(90 pages).
http://jwleaks.org/candace-conti/.
My brain is bruised after reading the entire response. It is very strong in supporting the original decision. I enjoyed how they threw it back on the original lawyers for the WT that they didn't object during the trial, and are whining about it now because of the decision. You cannot appeal based on YOUR mistakes.
zed
just ran upon this info:.
candace conti beats the watchtower society!submitted by teeny on august 27, 2012 - 9:22 pm .
http://www.jehovahswitnessblog.com/jw-lawsuits/candace-conti-beats-the-watchtower-society/?fb_action_ids=348543075229733&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=246965925417366.
The respondent's brief is longer than the Watchtower's. I can't wait to read it!
zed
lots of proper pioneering (90 hours), lots of calls, lots of studies, lots of interest.
enough to make it all interesting.
driving this buzz was the sense that armageddon was imminent.. my father was never a jw, and was very opposed.
wizz,
Welcome, and glad you are here!
I can relate to much of your story. You are now just beginning to free your mind. Let me make a suggestion to you. I know that you still have hope for some of the promises you were taught. But start completely over with a clean slate. I started with "is the sky blue?"
Then you will be able to get a clearer picture of what real truth is. Read other peoples experiences and learn from their journeys. Then evolve into the "you" that is healthy and whole.
Best of luck to you on this roller coaster ride!
zed
is it possible that someone has a jw friend who's very active in the congregation, knows you don't believe it anymore, and is still your friend?
i'm at the point where word is getting out that i'm not going to meetings anymore, and friends ask me if they'll be seeing me at the ca and i tell them i'm not going.
they want to know why, and what they can do to encourage me.
Conditional friends can be replaced by unconditional ones. I did!
zed
when we got to paragraphs 10,11 with the reference to the box at the top of the page - is your teaching up-to-date?
the conductor asked for an explanation of what the current 'bible truth' was.
for the first one, 'this generation (matt 24:34) absolutely nobody raised their hand!
That box might bite the GB in the butt. My mother came home and didn't catch the "overlapping generations" change the first time around. After seeing that box she is researching it becasue it makes no sense to her.
zed
does anyone find it odd that it seems there's less of a vocal apostate movement for scientology and mormons.
i'm getting this from google - i can't seem to find any majour forums like this one, or websites that are regularly updated exposing doctrines etc.. there is stuff out there, but from my search at least it doesn't seem to be as much as jw's.. strange considering mormons have 13 mill (?).
scientologists 'claim' 8 mill.. .
even then it will be just be a sunday to see if the fall off come true, or not.. heck this year and next will probally just enough to make it look like i showed up for it.
thankfully i live around the city it's held in i so it's not a huge sacrafice..
I last attended in 2001, it was a space oddity.
zed
growing up in the uk we didnt hear any stories about smurfs being demonic or evil etc, i watched the smurfs without a bad consciense.. what were the stories?
the rules and the reasons why?
how widespread was this crazy idea?.
I think they can all go smurf themselves!
zed